|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Dee Tearant
   |
Posted - 2010.04.20 17:27:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Grumpy much that you are not allowed to run for CSM5 due to the stuff you pulled?
Got a link to any such announcement?
|
Dee Tearant
|
Posted - 2010.04.20 19:51:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Originally by: Dee Tearant
Got a link to any such announcement?
I thought it was public knowledge that Lark isn't allowed to run again after he shamed the whole CSM for his own pathetic selfish greed, and that he is lucky he isn't banned?
I thought it was public knowledge that CCP stated he could run again in future. In fact here is the announcement in a dev blog.
Quote:
It is a voluntary act and not a case of jumping before being pushed and I will be allowed to run for another term in the future if I so desire.
It is true Lark wasn't allowed to run for CSM4, because it was "too soon" but there was never a statement from CCP to state he couldn't run again.
However you seem totally certain he isn't allowed to run for CSM5. In the absence of any official CCP statement I and others will have to assume you are party to privileged information on this subject which you thought you would use to get one over Lark on a public forum. Isn't using privileged information inappropriately what got Lark into trouble in the first place? Sets the tone for your campaign 
|
Dee Tearant
|
Posted - 2010.04.21 10:44:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
I don't know anything more than you do. I must have mistaken the CSM4 ban with a complete ban for the CSM.
Doesn't that show a lack of attention to detail?
Originally by: SlaveChild 101
Now goon fleet are no longer able to vote ***** i think its time we have some fresh blood amongst the CSM members.
You and I must have a different opinion of "fresh blood"
So far Ankhesentapemkah has been in CSM 1 and 2 and has been in CSM 3 and 4 via proxy (in many cases drafting issues for her selected proxy and putting them on the Wiki for them - no attempt made to disguise this behaviour).
"Fresh blood" would imply somebody new to the process.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
Q: Aren't two terms on the CSM enough for you?
A: I am personally very sceptical to lifting the term limit, and was rather enjoying my vacation. However, the CSM have now become official stakeholders. While I was on the CSM, my influence was marginal.
Sceptical of the term limit removal but you are running again anyway. I guess the temptation of holding power directly instead of via proxy was too much for your distaste of the limit removal.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
I stand the best chance of getting elected for Take Care.
You are not independent at all, just you represent a group of people without an easily identifiable corp/alliance affiliation.
|
Dee Tearant
|
Posted - 2010.04.30 19:22:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
As CSM I'll approach the game from the perspective of a game designer, which is a neutral one.
The CSM are supposed to represent the players. CCP provide the game designers.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
The problem basically is, that the CSM mostly approached issues from a game design perspective.
Both of these quotes from you posted today though in reverse order. You blame previous CSM failure on acting like game designers but then commit to acting as a game designer if elected?
Contradiction much?
|
Dee Tearant
|
Posted - 2010.05.02 13:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: frumpster
Edited by: frumpster on 02/05/2010 13:15:49
I prefer my canditates to be a litle more mentally stable.
You have ceased to even attempt to explain away the disparity between your quotes and your purported views. I'd not be surprised if members of your immediate family were in politics - you use many of the same tactics. Answer enough of the questions to be seen to replying, but ignoring the juicy bits. Say something enough times and people will believe it (WOMD in Iraq, 'I understand the importance of pvp'), etc.
In the end, your quotes have plenty enough ammo to shoot your own platform down.
ninjatypoedit
Tech 2 damage control in effect. Linked post now states
Quote:
frumpster is a filthy troll.
Last edited by Ankhesentapemkah; 05-02-2010 at 09:46 AM.
So everyone will assume that whatever was in that nearly 4 year old post needed to be edited from history.
I am still waiting for an explanation of these two conflicting statements posted to this forum in a single day.
Originally by: Dee Tearant
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
As CSM I'll approach the game from the perspective of a game designer, which is a neutral one.
The CSM are supposed to represent the players. CCP provide the game designers.
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah
The problem basically is, that the CSM mostly approached issues from a game design perspective.
Both of these quotes from you posted today though in reverse order. You blame previous CSM failure on acting like game designers but then commit to acting as a game designer if elected?
Contradiction much?
I must be a troll because I require candidates to explain contradictions and empty promises.
|
|
|
| |
|